Vaulted vs scrt.link
Both use client-side encryption and zero-knowledge architecture — your secrets are encrypted in the browser before reaching the server. The key differences: Vaulted supports unlimited or multiple views (1–10) and longer expiration (up to 30 days), while scrt.link offers Slack integration and is open source.
| Feature | Vaulted | scrt.link |
|---|---|---|
| Client-side encryption | ||
| Zero-knowledge architecture | ||
| Encryption algorithm | AES-256-GCM | AES-256-GCM |
| Key never sent to server | ||
| Self-destructing links | ||
| Configurable view limit | Unlimited or 1–10 views | 1 view only |
| Passphrase protection | ||
| Custom expiration | Up to 30 days | Limited options |
| No account required | ||
| Free to use | ||
| Open source |
Key Differences
Both use client-side encryption with AES-256-GCM and zero-knowledge architecture. Your secrets are encrypted in the browser before reaching either service. The core encryption model is equivalent.
The biggest practical difference is view limits. Vaulted supports unlimited views or 1–10 configurable views and expiration up to 30 days. scrt.link is single-view only with more limited expiration options.
scrt.link offers Slack and API integrations, making it suited for team workflows. Vaulted focuses on the simplest possible sharing experience with stronger view controls.
Choose Vaulted if
- You need recipients to view a secret more than once (up to 10 views)
- You want longer expiration windows (up to 30 days)
- You want fine-grained control over how many times a secret can be viewed
- Transparent cryptography matters to you (AES-256-GCM, documented)
Choose scrt.link if
- You want a Slack integration for sharing secrets in team channels
- Single-view secrets are all you need
- You prefer an open-source solution you can audit
- You want API integrations for your team workflow